[GitHub] ant-ivy pull request #32: A few loose bits in JUnit 4 migration

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[GitHub] ant-ivy pull request #32: A few loose bits in JUnit 4 migration

apupier
GitHub user twogee opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/32

    A few loose bits in JUnit 4 migration

    This adds annotations that are missing, migrates example code and fixes whitespace

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/twogee/ant-ivy master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/32.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #32
   
----
commit fbbf092e4986635703bf9a3bfd57d4f639c86095
Author: twogee <[hidden email]>
Date:   2017-05-26T12:00:16Z

    A few loose bits in JUnit 4 migration

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [hidden email] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #32: A few loose bits in JUnit 4 migration

apupier
Github user twogee commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/32
 
    Why is Jenkins lacking org.apache.tools.ant.util.ProcessUtil? Something wrong with Ant?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [hidden email] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #32: A few loose bits in JUnit 4 migration

apupier
In reply to this post by apupier
Github user nlalevee commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/32
 
    The job was configure to use the default Ant, which I don't know which is exactly. So I have changed the conf to use Ant 1.9.9 (the same version that the one declared in the ivy.xml of Ivy).
    A new build is coming.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [hidden email] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #32: A few loose bits in JUnit 4 migration

apupier
In reply to this post by apupier
Github user twogee commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/32
 
    Unless I'm mistaken, `BuildFileRule` was available first in 1.9.5; `ProcessUtil` needs 1.9.4


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [hidden email] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #32: A few loose bits in JUnit 4 migration

apupier
In reply to this post by apupier
Github user twogee commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/32
 
    Jenkins build was complete an hour ago, but status on Github is still pending...


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [hidden email] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[GitHub] ant-ivy pull request #32: A few loose bits in JUnit 4 migration

apupier
In reply to this post by apupier
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/32


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [hidden email] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Loading...