New Release(s)?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

New Release(s)?

Stefan Bodewig
Hi all

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 is a serious
regression in 1.10.2 and it has been fixed in master by now. The 1.9.x
branch has never been affected.

By now I have reviewed all changes of the really big commit that also
caused the regression. I found a few more places that needed fixes, but
most of them were in little used parts of Ant. I also found the same
refactoring commit fixed issues with the JAI types[1] and back-ported
them to 1.9.x - but doubt it is important as nobody has ever complained
so far.

We also probably fixed
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62076 in both branches
and this one has explicitly been reported against 1.9.x. I'll add a few
tests to both branches before closing that.

I think we should release 1.10.3 soon - with or without the junit5 task
- but am unsure about 1.9.11. What do you think? I'd volunteer to create
only a 1.10 release but also to do both at the same time.

Stefan

[1] the "text" image operation completely ignored the bold and italic
attributes - and some of the draw operations probably didn't work
properly if they contained additional transformations and additional
draw operations as nested elements.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Release(s)?

Jaikiran Pai
I am in favour of both a 1.10.3 and 1.9.11 release.

-Jaikiran


On 18/02/18 3:07 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:

> Hi all
>
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 is a serious
> regression in 1.10.2 and it has been fixed in master by now. The 1.9.x
> branch has never been affected.
>
> By now I have reviewed all changes of the really big commit that also
> caused the regression. I found a few more places that needed fixes, but
> most of them were in little used parts of Ant. I also found the same
> refactoring commit fixed issues with the JAI types[1] and back-ported
> them to 1.9.x - but doubt it is important as nobody has ever complained
> so far.
>
> We also probably fixed
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62076 in both branches
> and this one has explicitly been reported against 1.9.x. I'll add a few
> tests to both branches before closing that.
>
> I think we should release 1.10.3 soon - with or without the junit5 task
> - but am unsure about 1.9.11. What do you think? I'd volunteer to create
> only a 1.10 release but also to do both at the same time.
>
> Stefan
>
> [1] the "text" image operation completely ignored the bold and italic
> attributes - and some of the draw operations probably didn't work
> properly if they contained additional transformations and additional
> draw operations as nested elements.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]