thinking about new releases

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

thinking about new releases

Stefan Bodewig
Hi all

given https://dev.snyk.io/research/zip-slip-vulnerability lists Ant
1.9.12 as a release fixing a security problem it might be a good idea to
actually release 1.9.12 :-)

AFAICS there is no unfinished work in either branch, but I may be
wrong. I am aware there ar enhancement requests around javadoc that may
be worth waiting for for 1.10.x. Is anybody else planning to do
something that should be finished before creating release candidates?

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: thinking about new releases

Gintautas Grigelionis
Den lör 16 juni 2018 kl 18:08 skrev Stefan Bodewig <[hidden email]>:

> Hi all
>
> given https://dev.snyk.io/research/zip-slip-vulnerability lists Ant
> 1.9.12 as a release fixing a security problem it might be a good idea to
> actually release 1.9.12 :-)
>
> AFAICS there is no unfinished work in either branch, but I may be
> wrong. I am aware there ar enhancement requests around javadoc that may
> be worth waiting for for 1.10.x. Is anybody else planning to do
> something that should be finished before creating release candidates?
>

I assume that you're referring to [1] and [2].
I merely documented the new switches of javadoc in Java 9+, but that's all.
+1 to release 1.9.12 and 1.10.4

Gintas

[1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62424
[2] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62441
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: thinking about new releases

Jaikiran Pai
In reply to this post by Stefan Bodewig
+1. I don't have anything in a state that I can push to either of these
branches, in the immediate future.

-Jaikiran


On 16/06/18 9:38 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:

> Hi all
>
> given https://dev.snyk.io/research/zip-slip-vulnerability lists Ant
> 1.9.12 as a release fixing a security problem it might be a good idea to
> actually release 1.9.12 :-)
>
> AFAICS there is no unfinished work in either branch, but I may be
> wrong. I am aware there ar enhancement requests around javadoc that may
> be worth waiting for for 1.10.x. Is anybody else planning to do
> something that should be finished before creating release candidates?
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: thinking about new releases

Stefan Bodewig
OK, then I'll revert the antunit change so the source release ships with
a released version of it and prepare release candidates sometime the
coming days.

The alternative would be to cut an AntUnit release first which also
works for me if enough people are willing to vote on that.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: thinking about new releases

Jaikiran Pai
I am willing to test and vote on an AntUnit release.

-Jaikiran


On 18/06/18 12:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:

> OK, then I'll revert the antunit change so the source release ships with
> a released version of it and prepare release candidates sometime the
> coming days.
>
> The alternative would be to cut an AntUnit release first which also
> works for me if enough people are willing to vote on that.
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: thinking about new releases

Gintautas Grigelionis
Me too.

Gintas

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 at 11:19, Jaikiran Pai <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I am willing to test and vote on an AntUnit release.
>
> -Jaikiran
>
>
> On 18/06/18 12:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > OK, then I'll revert the antunit change so the source release ships with
> > a released version of it and prepare release candidates sometime the
> > coming days.
> >
> > The alternative would be to cut an AntUnit release first which also
> > works for me if enough people are willing to vote on that.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: thinking about new releases

Stefan Bodewig
Thanks

on second thought I'd prefer to decouple the two releases (ant and
AntUnit) and will prepare RCs for them independently.

Stefan

On 2018-06-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:

> Me too.

> Gintas

> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 at 11:19, Jaikiran Pai <[hidden email]> wrote:

>> I am willing to test and vote on an AntUnit release.

>> -Jaikiran


>> On 18/06/18 12:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> OK, then I'll revert the antunit change so the source release ships with
>>> a released version of it and prepare release candidates sometime the
>>> coming days.

>>> The alternative would be to cut an AntUnit release first which also
>>> works for me if enough people are willing to vote on that.

>>> Stefan

>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]



>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]